USPTO serial 75492387
PROCASH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROCASH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patricia B. Hogan
PATRICIA B HOGAN CINNATIKEATING MUETHING & KLEKAMP PLL1400 PROVIDENT TWR 1 E 4TH ST FL 1 CINCINCINNATI, OH 45202-3713Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | BANKING SERVICES, NAMELY CASH-MANAGEMENT PRODUCTS AND SERVICES FOR CONTROL OF CASH FLOWS | ABANDONED | Sep 10, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |