Drawing for LEARNING VILLAGE

USPTO serial 75492518

LEARNING VILLAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MEIER, SHARON A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LEARNING VILLAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009product, sold in a package or a box in retail stores, will contain educational software programmes in the fields of math, reading and writing, languages, natural sciences, history, geography, drawing, graphic design, crafts, sports skills (hockey, baseball, football and skating) for children and young adults; these software programmes are installed on CD-ROM disks or floppy disks are accompanied by printed instructional materials, in the form of books, magazines, or brochures sold as a unitACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 2001PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jun 19, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 26, 2000PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Sep 10, 1999CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 8, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 16, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 22, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 1998AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance