USPTO serial 75492638
ORA2
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ORA2?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Osaka-fu, 569-1134, JP
Osaka-fu, 569-1134, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LESLIE BERTAGNOLLI
LESLIE BERTAGNOLLI BAKER & MCKENZIE1 PRUDENTIAL PLZ130 E RANDOLPH DR STE 3500CHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Dentrifices, mouth washes (not for medicinal purposes), sprays for cleaning, deodorizing or refreshing the mouth | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Dental cements, medicines for dental purposes, namely, for treating gingivitis, bad breath, cavities, mouth sores and mouth pain | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Toothbrushes, dental floss | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Chewing gums, candy, confectionery, namely, caramel, flavored and sweetened gelatin | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sunstar, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Sunstar, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named ORA2
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 6, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 22, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 19, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 25, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 5, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 5, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 9, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |