Drawing for ICAT

USPTO serial 75493154

ICAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VANSTON, KATHY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ICAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BRENT SANDERS

BRENT SANDERS PERKINS COIE LLP1201 3RD AVE 40TH FLSEATTLE, WA 98101-3099UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Computerized on-line retail services via telephone and computer terminal in the fields of general consumer goods and services; cooperative marketing services, namely acquiring group discounts for others in the field of on-line advertisingACTIVE—
042Leasing and providing access to proprietary and third party computer databases and networks featuring computerized shopping via telephone and computer terminals in the fields of general consumer goods and services; computer services, namely, providing computer databases containing research and reference materials pertaining to business, finance, news, computing, computer software and electronic commerce; providing computer databases and access to web sites in the fields of general consumer goods and services; hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; providing consultation services for the creation of electronic catalogs and databases related applications on global and internal communications networks; software consulting, development and design services relating to electronic catalogs and other database-related applications; research and analysis of on-line consumer behaviorACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 11, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 14, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 19, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance