Drawing for EXELON

USPTO serial 75493880

EXELON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BAIRD, MICHAEL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EXELON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ALEX R SLUZAS

ALEX R SLUZAS PAUL & PAUL2000 MARKET ST STE 2900PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Equipment for metering, monitoring, communication control and billing, between electric power and gas providers and their customers, namely, utility meter encoders; gas meter encoders; universal controllers; telephone to power-line carrier gateways; utility meter concentrators; load management controllers; power line modems; utility interface units; utility meter interface modules; power management hardware, namely power sensor, power line interrupters, power controllers; electric meters; gas meters; automated meter readers; automated meter reading computer hardware and software, supervisory control and data acquisition computer hardware and software, on-line remote billing meters, on-line remote billing computer hardware and software; automated energy use controllers; appliance load-monitors and controllers; network transducers; power line transceiversACTIVE—
011Furnaces; heat exchangers; ventilating fans for commercial and industrial use; and water heaters for commercial, industrial and domestic useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 28, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 13, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 13, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 21, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 20, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 28, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 23, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 6, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 7, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 7, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 4, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 18, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 16, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 12, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance