Drawing for WARRIOR

USPTO serial 75494043

WARRIOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ISAACSON, GINNY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WARRIOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JENNIFER A SPARKS

JENNIFER A SPARKS MAYNARD, MURRAY, CRONIN ERICKSON ET AL1800 GREAT AMERICAN TWR3200 N CENTRAL AVEPHOENIX, AZ 85012

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Toys and sporting goods; namely, toy molding sets comprised of molds of action heroic and other figures and plaster; kits for making and decorating toy figures, comprised of molds for action figures and toy clothes; flying disks; wrestling gear kits comprised of wrestling belts, wrestling masks and costumes; jigsaw puzzles; board games; head shaped water squirt toys; teddy bears; dolls; hand held units for playing electronic games that incorporate a heroic warrior figure and hand held units for playing video games that incorporate a heroic warrior action figure and hand held units for playing electronic sports and action heroic figure games and action figuresACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 4, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 29, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 16, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 3, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 14, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 20, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 18, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 4, 2001PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 25, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 24, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 29, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 1999ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 29, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 6, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 22, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 21, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 21, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance