USPTO serial 75494168
MAXIMUM PERFORMANCE. PROVEN RELIABILITY.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SELTZER, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAXIMUM PERFORMANCE. PROVEN RELIABILITY.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROGER S BURLEIGH
ROGER S BURLEIGH BURLEIGH & ASSOCIATES1509 MAIN ST STE 1709DALLAS, TX 75201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | house mark for a full line of electrical and electronic apparatus for use in improving the quality of electrical power, namely, transient and voltage surge suppressors, power filtering apparatus for suppressing transient voltages and attenuating high-frequency noise on power circuits within electronic products or throughout a building electrical distribution system, power harmonic cancellation apparatus for minimizing non-zero neutral currents in multi-phase power distribution systems, power converters, electrical and electronic apparatus for testing the condition of electronic components and power distribution systems, and electrical and electronic controllers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2000 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jun 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |