Drawing for ECODE

USPTO serial 75494268

ECODE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SPIVAK, ANDREW
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECODE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LORI N BOATRIGHT

LORI N BOATRIGHT BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVDSEVENTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer hardware and computer software that enables users to access and/or download features of an on-line database of personalized business cards and address booksACTIVE
035providing an on-line electronic database on global computer networks in the field of business, which affords businesses and members the ability to access contact information, including business cards and addressesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 28, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 16, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 30, 2000OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Nov 30, 2000OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
Sep 1, 2000OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
May 30, 2000ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Apr 25, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 24, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 10, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 21, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 13, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 11, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 10, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 16, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Jan 4, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance