USPTO serial 75494360
LILY POND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHEFFIELD, SHARI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LILY POND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MARTHA STEWART LIVING OMNIMEDIA LLC
New York, NY
Other trademarks owned by MARTHA STEWART LIVING OMNIMEDIA LLC
MARTHA STEWART LIVING OMNIMEDIA LLC
New York, NY
Other trademarks owned by MARTHA STEWART LIVING OMNIMEDIA LLC
MARTHA STEWART LIVING OMNIMEDIA, INC.
NEW YORK, NY
Other trademarks owned by MARTHA STEWART LIVING OMNIMEDIA, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HOWARD J SHIRE
HOWARD J SHIRE LAW OFFICE OF KENYON & KENYON1 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Home furnishings and accessories, namely, pillow cases, sheets, blankets, curtains, valances, pillow shams, comforters, quilts, bedspreads, bed skirts, duvets, comforter covers, towels, afghans, dish cloths, pot holders, table cloths not of paper, cloth napkins, textile place mats, shower curtains and draperies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MARTHA STEWART LIVING OMNIMEDIA LLC
- Other trademarks owned by MARTHA STEWART LIVING OMNIMEDIA LLC
- Other trademarks owned by MARTHA STEWART LIVING OMNIMEDIA, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named LILY POND
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 22, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 6, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 20, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 7, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 3, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 21, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 3, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 1, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 29, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 31, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 24, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 2, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |