USPTO serial 75494451
FLOOR-BARRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2824217Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 23, 2004
- Examiner
- CLARK, GLENN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FLOOR-BARRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY
New York, NY
New York, NY
New York, NY
New York, NY
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric Stenshoel
Eric Stenshoel Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP101 Park Avenue34th FloorNew York, NY 10178-0061Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely, instruction in the ballet field | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rommett, Zena
- Other trademarks owned by Rommett, Zena
- Other trademarks owned by Romanovich, Camille
- Other trademarks owned by Romanovich, Camille
- Other trademarks owned by Romanovich, Camille
- Other trademarks owned by Rommett, Zena
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named FLOOR-BARRE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2015 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Aug 30, 2014 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jul 22, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 30, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 24, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 1998 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 1998 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |