USPTO serial 75494972
BASKETBALL JONES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BASKETBALL JONES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MURIEL C HARITCHABALET
MURIEL C HARITCHABALET FULWIDER PATTON LEE & UTECHT LLPHOWARD HUGHES CTR6060 CTR DR 10TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90045Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Providing on-line chat rooms for transmission of messages among computer users via a global computer network concerning information of general interest | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, motion picture and television production and distribution services; entertainment services, namely, providing information in the nature of news, trivia, facts, commentary and statistics all related to sports, sports figures, motion pictures and merchandising related thereto provided via an interactive global computer network; and providing a multi-user, interactive, on-line computer game and contest | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 3, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 3, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 11, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 10, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 24, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |