Drawing for ADVANTAGE SERIES

USPTO serial 75495037

ADVANTAGE SERIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GREENBAUM, CINDY BETH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ADVANTAGE SERIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lauri S. Thompson and others of 502466

Lauri S. Thompson and others of 502466 Greenberg Traurig, LLP3773 Howard Hughes Pkwy.Suite 400 N.Las Vegas, NV 89169

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Central vacuum cleaning systems and components thereof, namely, electric vacuum power units, electric power brushes, turbine brushes, wands, upholstery tools, hard floor tools, dusting brushes, pet brushes, crevice tools, tool sets, tool caddies, extension cords, hoses, protective hose sleeves, mufflers, hose wall inlets, dust pan inlets and trimplates, plastic tubing and tubing fixturesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 25, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 25, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 4, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 24, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 1, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 30, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 26, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 23, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Feb 16, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance