USPTO serial 75495648
THE FORCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROCKETT, CYNTHIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE FORCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CAROLE F BARRETT
CAROLE F BARRETT COUDERT BROTHERSFOUR EMBARCADERO CTRSTE 3300SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Soft drink colas, fruit juice concentrates, fruit drinks, fruit flavored soft drinks, fruit juices, ginger ale, tomato juice, vegetable juice lemonade, mineral water, soft drink pop, quinine water, seltzer water, soda water, drinking water, fruit flavored drinks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 25, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 26, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |