Drawing for SEVEN

USPTO serial 75495741

SEVEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VANSTON, KATHY
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SEVEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

NANETTE M NORTON

NANETTE M NORTON BRINKS HOFE GILSON & LIONE455 N CITYFRONT PLZ DR 36TH FLCHICAGO, IL 60611UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Research, design and consulting for computer hardware and computer software; computer programming for others; revision of electronic images and data; commercial art and industrial design; providing computer image data basesABANDONEDSep 9, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 13, 2005MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jun 13, 2005ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jun 13, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 13, 2005OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 31, 2000OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 15, 2000ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 17, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 22, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 22, 2000IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Dec 17, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 12, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 22, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 1999CNRUDISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED—
Feb 19, 1999AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 21, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 14, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 11, 1999IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 5, 1998AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance