USPTO serial 75495764
DR. JOHN R. CHRISTOPHER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2760530Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 9, 2003
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DR. JOHN R. CHRISTOPHER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | processed herbal food supplements | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 23, 1976 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Christopher Enterprises, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Christopher Enterprises, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Christopher Enterprises, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named DR. JOHN R. CHRISTOPHER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 17, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 28, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 19, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 7, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |