USPTO serial 75496244
EYE CANDY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2753328Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 19, 2003
- Examiner
- CARRUTHERS, SUE
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EYE CANDY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John W. Patton, Esq.
JOAN KUPERSMITH LARKIN SEYFARTH SHAW LLP2029 CENTURY PARK EASTSUITE 3500LOS ANGELES, CA 90067 3021Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Nail polish, lipstick, eye shadow, eyeliner, mascara, blush, foundation, body soaps, body powder, body lotion, body cream, bath and shower gel, hair shampoo and hair conditioner, hair mousse, hair spray, nail glitter, scented body spray, glitter body gel, and glitter body cream | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 1995 |
| 014 | Earrings, jewelry, watches | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 1995 |
| 018 | Handbags, wallets, tote bags, backpacks, umbrellas | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 1995 |
| 025 | Belts, panties, socks, tights, hats, gloves, scarves, lingerie, footwear | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 1995 |
| 026 | Hair bands, hair clips, ponytail holders | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 1995 |
| 035 | Retail store services featuring apparel, footwear, cosmetics, fragrances, health and beauty aids, candles, hair accessories, jewelry, watches, handbags and carry bags, stationery goods, key chains, picture frames and giftware | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Clothestime Stores, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Clothestime Stores, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Clothestime Stores, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named EYE CANDY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2013 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 25, 2013 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 27, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 19, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 15, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 26, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 24, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 18, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 5, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 23, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |