USPTO serial 75496279
OHIO IR-SERVER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OHIO IR-SERVER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
6824 BH Arnhem, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KAREN G MCCLOAT
KAREN G MCCLOAT GRAHAM CAMPAIGN PC36 W 44TH STNEW YORK, NY 10036-8178UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software servers for a database environment, software for searching, checking input data, deduplication and comparing relationship data; computer memories | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Brochures, leaflets and magazines about software servers for a database environment and operational business problems with entering, printing, storing and exchange of relationship data in electronic data processing environment | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer programming and development for others; computer engineering; computer consultation, namely, computer hardware and software selection; computer systems analysis; consulting and advice in the field of entering, printing, storing, and exchange of relationship data in electronic data processing environment; writing surveys, business design and specification reports for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |