Drawing for BEST! IMPERATIV HRMS

USPTO serial 75496422

BEST! IMPERATIV HRMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, LINDA M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEST! IMPERATIV HRMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARSHA G GENTNER

MARSHA G GENTNER JACOBSON PRICE HOLMAN & STERN PLLCTHE JENIFER BLDG400 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR HUMAN RESOURCE, PAYROLL, W-2 AND TAX PROCESSING AND EMPLOYEE MANAGEMENTACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 3, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 13, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 29, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 3, 2002EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 21, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Dec 19, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 11, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 10, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 10, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 10, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 10, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 25, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 2, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 1, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance