USPTO serial 75496625
WORKFLOW MANAGEMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2497245Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 9, 2001
- Examiner
- TOLPIN, BRETT
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WORKFLOW MANAGEMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT E SMARTSCHAN
ROBERT E SMARTSCHAN KAUFMAN & CANOLES150 WEST MAIN STREETSUITE 2100NORFOLK, VA 23510Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Inventory control; Inventory and shelf arrangement, namely replenishing and resetting items for sale; order processing and order fulfillment services of office products and printed products | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 5, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FLEET NATIONAL BANK, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
- Other trademarks owned by Workflow Management, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Workflow Management, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named WORKFLOW MANAGEMENT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 11, 2012 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 24, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 19, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 21, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 12, 2001 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2000 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2000 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 3, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |