USPTO serial 75496689
TESMAC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALT, JILL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TESMAC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LESLEY S CRAIG
LESLEY S CRAIG TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP2 EMBARCADERO CTR 8TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3834UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | MEDICAL INSTRUMENT FOR THE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF NEUROMUSCULAR AND EYE DISEASES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 21, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 10, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 23, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 20, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 7, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 29, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |