USPTO serial 75497135
NATURE'S CALLING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NATURE'S CALLING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
AWT Advanced Wood Technology Ltd.
Tracyville New BrunswickEOG 3CO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAY F MOLDOVANYI
JAY F MOLDOVANYI FAY SHARPE BEALL FAGAN MINNICH & MCKEE1100 SUPERIOR AVE STE 700CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2518UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | pet litter | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jul 4, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 5, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |