USPTO serial 75497146
DIRECT WIRELESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWITZER, SANDY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIRECT WIRELESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GAIL M TAYLOR-RUSSELL
GAIL M TAYLOR-RUSSELL TAYLOR RUSSELL & RUSSELL PC4807 SPICEWOOD SPRINGS RDBLDG ONE STE 1200AUSTIN, TX 78759Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telephone equipment, namely, mobile wireless telephones, fixed unit wireless and wired telephones, repeater stations, and battery chargers for telephones for establishing telephone service in a localized communication area | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Wireless telecommunications services, namely, telephone service for a localized communication area | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |