USPTO serial 75497444
GROWTHMINDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRIFFIN, JAMES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GROWTHMINDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY C JOHNSON
694 SPRING STHERNDON, VA 20170UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | providing tips and information for everyday living, specifically, providing information on new releases of videos, books, pamphlets and other written materials regarding appropriate games, toys and structured activities associated with the growth and development of children, and providing notices of conferences and trade shows in the field of games, toys and structured activities associated with the growth and development of children, all via the global computer network and via electronic mail | ACTIVE | Sep 30, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 27, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |