USPTO serial 75497789
COSMOPOLITAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COSMOPOLITAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BARRY S. AGDERN
BARRY S AGDERN THE HEARST COPORATION959 8TH AVEOFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSELNEW YORK, NY 10019Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | entertainment services, namely the production and distribution of television programming consisting of programs or segments on cooking, the concerns and interests of women, the concerns and interests of men, human relationships, financial advice, history, health, exercise, fashion, motion picture reviews, astrology and/or motion pictures | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 4, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 7, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 7, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |