USPTO serial 75497959
180
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KREBS, CATHERINE K.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 180?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWARD M. PRINCE
EDWARD M PRINCE ALSTON & BIRD LLPN BLDG11TH FL 601 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | slacks, jeans, shorts, shirts, skirts, socks, knit tops, knit bottoms, dresses, jackets, vests, belts and hats, sold through department stores and discount stores | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2002 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 9, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 9, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 17, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |