USPTO serial 75498289
IMP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IMP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT W MULCAHY
ROBERT W MULCAHY MSC 2061APPLIED MATERIALS INC2881 SCOTT BLVDSANTA CLARA, CA 95054Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Semiconductor Wafer Processing Equipment and Components, namely, epitaxial reactors; chemical vapor deposition reactors, physical vapor deposition reactors; plasma etchers; ion implanters and chemical mechanical polishers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 29, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 23, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 22, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 30, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |