Drawing for SMALLBIZBOOKS.COM

USPTO serial 75498378

SMALLBIZBOOKS.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FLETCHER, TRACY L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SMALLBIZBOOKS.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HENRY M BISSELL

Henry M. Bissell Bissell Law Office6321 Riggs PlaceLos Angeles, CA 90045UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035advertising and business services, namely, arranging for the promotion of goods and services to small business owners and members of the public interested in information about small business operations by preparing and placing advertisements by means of a global computer network and other computer online service providers, providing expert business consulting services and business information for the use of customers in the field of starting and operating small businesses by means of a global computer information network and via other computer online service providersACTIVEOct 2, 1997
042association services, namely promoting the interests of small businesses via the dissemination of information on issues, trends and challenges of starting and running a small businessACTIVEOct 2, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 19, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 12, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 6, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 2, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 29, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2000DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 7, 2000DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 2, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance