USPTO serial 75498424
MCCORMICKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 3, 2001
- Examiner
- WILSON, ANGELA BISHOP
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MCCORMICKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
London, Ontario N5W 5Y4, CA
London, Ontario N5W 5Y4, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANNE F. DOWNEY
ANNE F DOWNEY DOWNEY & DOWNEY8999 ROCKWOOD RDBOSTON, NY 14025-5423UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 9, 2002 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 23, 2001 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 21, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 3, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 27, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |