Drawing for MERISTAR

USPTO serial 75498466

MERISTAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOHNSON, STACEY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MERISTAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID R BENNETT

DAVID R BENNETT ROPER & QUIGG200 S MICHIGAN AVESTE 1000CHICAGO, IL 60604

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Management of restaurants, hotels and resorts for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 11, 2001ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Feb 27, 2001ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 27, 2001OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 27, 2001OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
May 18, 2000OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 19, 2000ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 19, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 12, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 30, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 7, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 7, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 24, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance