Drawing for DIGITAL PROJECTION

USPTO serial 75498880

DIGITAL PROJECTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2339350Status 800Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 4, 2000
Examiner
MELNICK, DIANE B.
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with DIGITAL PROJECTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mainak H. Mehta

Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves and Savitch LLP525 B. Street, Suite 2200,San Diego, CA 92101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009goods consisting of electronic large screen displays with capabilities to image all formats of video and computer sourcesACTIVEApr 1, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 18, 2020NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2020RNL2REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jun 18, 202089AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jun 18, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 2, 2020E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2019REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2010RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Aug 20, 201089AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Aug 18, 2010E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 29, 20058.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Sep 27, 2005PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Aug 16, 20058.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
Aug 16, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2000R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Feb 10, 2000CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Oct 18, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 23, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 9, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 14, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance