USPTO serial 75499242
PLUTOGRAMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROBERTSON, DEIRDRE G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PLUTOGRAMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
VIRGINIA H MEYER
VIRGINIA H MEYER LAW OFFICE OF VIRGINIA H MEYER475 GATE FIVE RD STE 275SAUSALITO, CA 94965UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Paper products, namely, greeting cards, note cards, postcards, posters and adhesive and non-adhesive note pads and writing pads | ACTIVE | Aug 30, 1999 |
| 038 | Telegram transmission and communication in the form of electronic greeting cards, note cards, postcards, posters, note pads, writing pads or printouts thereof obtained from the global computer information network | ACTIVE | May 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 5, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 27, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 25, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 11, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 7, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |