Drawing for THE 50+ SUNSCREEN THAT WON'T RUB OFF

USPTO serial 75499277

THE 50+ SUNSCREEN THAT WON'T RUB OFF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2384600Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 12, 2000
Examiner
MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE 50+ SUNSCREEN THAT WON'T RUB OFF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025sun protective, clothing, namely, swim wear, hats, shirts, shorts, and shoesSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDMay 28, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 10, 2011C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Aug 2, 2011CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Jan 3, 2008REINREINSTATED—
May 10, 2006C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
May 10, 2006CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 25, 2006CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Feb 13, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 15, 2005PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 12, 2000R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 20, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 19, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 19, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 13, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 7, 2000REINREINSTATED—
Sep 13, 1999ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 27, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 31, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance