USPTO serial 75499400
CASUAL HOME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGLETON, RUDY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CASUAL HOME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
46 870 Onteniente (Valencia), ES
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LUCILLE P NICHOLS
LUCILLE P NICHOLS DARBY & DARBY PC805 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Natural and synthetic fabrics and textiles namely, chenille fabric, felt cloth, silk cloth, woolen cloth, woolen fabric, cotton fabric, curtain fabric, nylon fabric, polyester fabric, rayon fabric, upholstery fabrics, and velvet for use in the manufacture of bed, table and household linen products; bed, table and household linen, namely, bed linen, bed blankets, bed canopies, bed linen, bed sheets, bed spreads, pillow cases, duvet covers, mattress covers, duvets, elder downs, quilts; table linen, textile place mats, table mats (not of paper), table cloths (not of paper), fabric table runners, textile napkins, household linen, curtains, and net curtains | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |