USPTO serial 75499615
KEYMAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CRAWFORD, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KEYMAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
75017 Paris, FR
75017 Paris, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN E OTTAVIANI
JOHN E OTTAVIANI EDWARDS & ANGELL LLP1 BANKBOSTON PLZPROVIDENCE, RI 02903UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for use in document management namely accessing, storing, searching for, retrieving, controlling versions of and controlling security for documents on internal networks, organization or internal computer networks and via a global information network; imaging, namely scanning of paper documents, modifying scanned images and converting scanned images to searchable, editable documents; and workflow applications, namely automating the process of modifying documents, and moving documents from user to user via internal mail systems and organization or internal computer networks and a global information network and connection and exchange with groupware applications | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer software consulting services, computer programming services for others, and computer software integration services, namely software installation, integration of software with other software and hardware | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 16, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 8, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 16, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 26, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |