USPTO serial 75499842
LAURENT-PERRIER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 24, 2003
- Examiner
- TAMBOURINO, ANTHONY
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LAURENT-PERRIER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
51100 Reims, FR
51150 Tours-Sur-Maine, FR
51150 Tours-Sur-Maine, FR
51100 Reims, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Paper and cardboard articles, namely, cardboard, paper bags, envelopes, paper pouches for packaging, cardboard mailing tubes, printed tickets, paper flags, paper and cardboard placards, paper or cardboard signs, blank or partially printed labels, paper napkins and paper table cloths, posters, pictures, photographs and scrapbook albums, bookbinding cloth, tape and wire; mounted and/or unmounted photographs; engravings, lithographs, etchings, paintings; stationery, paint brushes, playing cards, printing type, printing blocks; general circulation newspapers; catalogues, brochures, booklets, books, and printed and instructional and teaching materials all in the field of alcoholic beverages | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, local and long distance transmission of voice, data, graphics by means of telephone, telegraphic, cable and satellite transmissions; electronic transmission of messages and coded images; providing on-line forums for transmission of messages among computer users concerning information about beverages; wireless digital messaging services, electronic store and forward messaging, electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals, facsimile transmission, electronic mail services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Hotels, restaurants, providing banquet, and social function facilities for special occasions, cafes, cafeterias, bar services, canteen services, snack bar services, providing information concerning beverages, particularly champagne; correspondence exchange services, namely exchange of computerized documents | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Vve Laurent-Perrier & Co.
- Other trademarks owned by Laurent-Perrier
- Other trademarks owned by Laurent-Perrier
- Other trademarks owned by Vve Laurent-Perrier & Co.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named LAURENT-PERRIER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 9, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 19, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 11, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 3, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |