USPTO serial 75500117
ROULETTE KING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOAGNI, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROULETTE KING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Tokyo, 157-0066, JP
Tokyo, 157-0066, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SUSAN L HELLER
SUSAN L HELLER HOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI CANADY ET AL3 EMBARCADERO CTR FL 7SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4065UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Gaming apparatus, namely, gaming machines; lottery and cash-less wagering systems, consisting of slot machines, video poker gaming machines, gaming machines for playing keno, bingo, roulette, blackjack, pusher game, betting wheels, numbers, baccarat, craps, big and small, punto banko, faro and paigow, horse racing gaming machines, and parts therefor; automatic vending machines and their parts; bank note and coin exchanger machines and parts therefor; amusement apparatus adapted for use with television receivers, namely, video game machines for use with televisions; and related computer game software | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Coin or non-coin operated arcade games and their parts; hand-held type computer controlled video game equipment, namely, hand-held units for playing electronic and video games | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Sigma
- Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Sigma
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named ROULETTE KING
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 13, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 19, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 17, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 1, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 9, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |