USPTO serial 75500608
MECMESIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 4, 2001
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with MECMESIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Sussex, GB
Slinfold, West Sussex, GB
HALIFAX, GB
West Sussex, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey L. Wilson
Jeffrey L. Wilson Kacvinsky Daisak Bluni PLLC2601 Weston Parkway, Suite 103Cary, NC 27513UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MEASURING APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY ELECTRONIC STRAIN GAUGES, FORCE GAUGES, TORQUE GAUGES, ELECTRONIC STRAIN TEST SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF STRAIN LOAD CELLS OR SENSORS, ELECTRONICALLY-DRIVEN TEST STANDS ON WHICH TO MOUNT THE SENSOR AND THE COMPONENT OR SAMPLE TO BE TESTED, AND COMPUTER OPERATING SOFTWARE USED TO DRIVE THE TEST STANDS TO CARRY OUT A SERIES OF SELECTABLE TESTS AND TO INTERPRET AND GRAPHICALLY TO DISPLAY THE RESULTS, ELECTRONIC FORCE TEST SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF FORCE LOAD CELLS OR SENSORS, ELECTRONICALLY-DRIVEN TEST STANDS ON WHICH TO MOUNT THE SENSOR AND THE COMPONENT OR SAMPLE TO BE TESTED, AND COMPUTER OPERATING SOFTWARE USED TO DRIVE THE TEST STANDS TO CARRY OUT A SERIES OF SELECTABLE TESTS AND TO INTERPRET AND GRAPHICALLY TO DISPLAY THE RESULTS, ELECTRONIC TORQUE TEST SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF TORQUE TRANSDUCERS, ELECTRONICALLY-DRIVEN TEST STANDS ON WHICH TO MOUNT THE TRANSDUCER AND THE COMPONENT OR SAMPLE TO BE TESTED, AND COMPUTER-OPERATING SOFTWARE USED TO DRIVE THE TEST STANDS TO CARRY OUT A SERIES OF SELECTABLE TESTS AND TO INTERPRET AND GRAPHICALLY TO DISPLAY THE RESULTS, STRAIN LOAD CELLS, FORCE LOAD CELLS, TORQUE LOAD CELLS, TORQUE TRANSDUCERS, TORQUE WRENCH CALIBRATION UNITS, ELECTRONIC TEST STANDS FOR USE IN TESTING TORQUE AND STRAIN; COMPUTER-OPERATING SOFTWARE FOR ELECTRONIC STRAIN GAUGES, FORCE GAUGES, TORQUE GAUGES, STRAIN TEST SYSTEMS, FORCE TEST SYSTEMS, TORQUE TEST SYSTEMS, STRAIN LOAD CELLS, FORCE LOAD CELLS, TORQUE LOAD CELLS, TORQUE WRENCHES, TORQUE SCREWDRIVERS, TORQUE TRANSDUCERS, TORQUE WRENCH CALIBRATION UNITS, ELECTRONIC TEST STANDS FOR USE IN TESTING TORQUE AND STRAIN | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1988 |
| 037 | MAINTENANCE, REPAIR OF FORCE GAUGES, TORQUE GAUGES, TORQUE WRENCHES, AND CALIBRATION UNITS | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mecmesin Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Mecmesin Limited
- Other trademarks owned by PPT GROUP UK LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by Mecmesin Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named MECMESIN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2024 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 3, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2022 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2022 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 3, 2022 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 3, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 4, 2022 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 3, 2012 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 3, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 31, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 4, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 4, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 11, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 22, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 3, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |