USPTO serial 75500799
ATHENIAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 12, 2000
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ATHENIAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lee Grosskreuz Hechtel, Harold D. Jones
LEE GROSSKREUZ HECHTEL, HAROLD D JONES JASPAN SCHLESINGER HOFFMAN LLP300 GARDEN CITY PLZGARDEN CITY, NY 11530UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | ICE CREAM | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Athenian Ice Cream Co., Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Athenian Ice Cream Co., Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Athenian Ice Cream Co., Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named ATHENIAN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2011 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 30, 2007 | PRA8 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 1, 2007 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 11, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 25, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 11, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 3, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |