Drawing for DOE IN ESTRUS

USPTO serial 75500919

DOE IN ESTRUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SCHIFFRIN,JON
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DOE IN ESTRUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GERALD E HELGET

GERALD E HELGET BRIGGS & MORGAN, PA2400 IDS CTR 80 S EIGHTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001BUCK LURES AND DOE SCENTS USED IN HUNTINGACTIVEJun 1, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 10, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2000ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 28, 2000ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 24, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 22, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 24, 2000UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 12, 1999IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Sep 19, 1999AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 25, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 25, 1999IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 25, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance