USPTO serial 75500919
DOE IN ESTRUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHIFFRIN,JON
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DOE IN ESTRUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GERALD E HELGET
GERALD E HELGET BRIGGS & MORGAN, PA2400 IDS CTR 80 S EIGHTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BUCK LURES AND DOE SCENTS USED IN HUNTING | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2000 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 28, 2000 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 24, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 22, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 24, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 19, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 25, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |