USPTO serial 75501156
SMART PACKAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, LAVERNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMART PACKAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Osaka 545-8522, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT W ADAMS
ROBERT W ADAMS NIXON & VANDERHYE PC1100 N GLEBE RD 8TH FLARLINGTON, VA 22201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | INTEGRATED CIRCUITS FOR USE IN LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY APPARATUS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 30, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |