USPTO serial 75501552
CHIRAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEST, CAROLINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHIRAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KENNETH S KLARQUIST
KENNETH S KLARQUIST KLARQUIST SPARKMAN CAMPBELL LEIGH1 WORLD TRADE CTR STE 1600121 S W SALMON STPORTLAND, OR 97204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | skin care products, namely, facial cleansers, facial toners and mists, facial moisturizers, facial serums, eye gels and creams, facial masques, facial scrubs, soaps, lip balms; sun protection products, namely, creams, lotions and gels; anti-pigmentation products, namely, skin whitening creams, gels, and serums (topical), and facial powders; body and personal care products, namely, shower gels, body scrubs, body lotions and cream, sun protection lotions, bath crystals, massage oils and creams, skin toning creams and gels; hair care products, namely, shampoos, conditioners, hair and scalp treatment lotions and serums, hair and scalp masques, hair sprays, gels, and mousses | ACTIVE | Jun 5, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 28, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |