USPTO serial 75502430
QUALITY AS A BUSINESS STRATEGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, YONG OH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QUALITY AS A BUSINESS STRATEGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Philadelphia, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NED E BARLAS
NED E BARLAS PANITCH SCHWARZE JACOBS & NADEL PC1 COMMERCE SQ 22ND FL2005 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7086Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | data processing services; employment agency services; long term and short term placement of consultants, management, marketing, professional, legal, accounting, financial, administrative, sales, office and clerical personnel, technical, electronic data processing support, programmers and other computer personnel, engineering and industrial personnel and the management of such placements for others | ABANDONED | — |
| 037 | short term computer maintenance | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | short term computer software maintenance; consulting services in the fields of data processing, software engineering, software design, hardware engineering hardware design, and computer programming; computer software design for others; engineering, drafting and design services for others in the fields of electronics, chemicals, automobiles, petroleum, pharmaceuticals, aircraft, naval engineering and design, and power plants | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 1999 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |