USPTO serial 75502893
E-KNOWLEDGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRACEY, KAREN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with E-KNOWLEDGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Palo Alto, CA
Palo Alto, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JACK RUSSO
JACK RUSSO RUSSO & HALE LLP401 FLORENCE STPALO ALTO, CA 94301-1706UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | computer services, namely, providing on-line facilities, or chat rooms, for real-time interaction with other computer users in the field of information and database management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 24, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 11, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 14, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 18, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |