USPTO serial 75503206
DEEPAK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARD, JENNIFER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DEEPAK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Scarborough, Ontario M1X 1B9, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RAYMOND C STEWART
RAYMOND C STEWART BIRCH STEWART KOLASCH & BIRCH LLPP O BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Food products, whether dried, preserved, packaged or processed, namely, rice, namely, basmati rice, parboiled rice and long grain white rice; beans, namely, red kidney beans, black eye beans, and lima beans; peas, namely, pigeon peas and chick peas; bamboo shoots; water chestnuts; preserved vegetables, namely, artichokes, asparagus, kidney beans, lima beans, soy beans, navy beans, string beans, beet greens, beets, brussel sprouts, cabbages, carrots, cauliflower, celery, chard, corn, cucumbers, eggplants, lentils, mushrooms, okra, olives, onions, parsnips, peas, potatoes, sweet potatoes, peppers, hominy, pumpkins, radishes, rutabaga, sauerkraut, spinach, squash, turnips, and watercress; coconut milk and coconut cream | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Condiments, spices, seasonings, and herbs, whether dried, preserved, packaged or processed, namely, pickle relish and chutney, allspice, anise, capers, apsicum, caraway, cardamom, cayenne pepper, cinnamon, cloves, coriander, cubeb, curry, dill, fennel, ginger, mace, marjoram, mustard, nutmeg, paprika, pepper, sage, thyme, and turmeric, and condiments and pungent seasonings, namely, mustard, garlic, salt, leeks, onions, shallots, poppy seeds, caraway seeds, anise, and bay leaves, and herbs, namely, mint, basil, thyme, parsley, sage, tarragon, dill, cress and savory | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Juices and nectars of vegetables, namely, tomatoes, parsnips, pumpkins, squash, cucumbers, carrots, cauliflower, celery, cabbages, beets, and avocados; juices and nectars of fruits, namely, watermelons, strawberries, raspberries, pineapples, plums, pears, peaches, oranges, loganberries, lemons, gooseberries, grapes, grapefruit, rhubarb, currants, cantaloupes, cranberries, cherries, blackberries, blueberries, bananas, apples, apricots, muskmelons, nectarines, and tangerines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |