Drawing for INDEPENDENCE PARK INSTITUTE

USPTO serial 75503342

INDEPENDENCE PARK INSTITUTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2931015Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 8, 2005
Examiner
THOMAS, AMY E
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with INDEPENDENCE PARK INSTITUTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christiane S. Campbell

Christiane S. Campbell Duane Morris LLP30 S. 17th StreetPhiladelphia, PA 19103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services in the nature of providing, organizing, and conducting tours, class exercises, seminars and lectures relating to history, government and national parksSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJul 16, 2001
042Promoting greater public awareness of the founding documents, history, government and national parks of the United StatesSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 19, 2025CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Mar 8, 2024REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2015NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2015RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Mar 17, 201589AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Mar 17, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 2, 2015E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2011C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 18, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 7, 2011E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 22, 2004REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 17, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 14, 2004CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Dec 13, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 9, 2004SNEASU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN—
Dec 3, 2004SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 29, 2004EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Nov 28, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 11, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 28, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 28, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 28, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 10, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 26, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 26, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 30, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 28, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 22, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 2, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 28, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 5, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 13, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 14, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 7, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 7, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 29, 2001EXPREX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED—
Sep 4, 2001CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 12, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Mar 6, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 6, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 1, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 20, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 20, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 25, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance