Drawing for FUTURECOM FACTORY

USPTO serial 75503386

FUTURECOM FACTORY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAIN, CATHERINE P
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FUTURECOM FACTORY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JEFFREY H KAUFMAN

JEFFREY H KAUFMAN OBLON SPIVAK MCCLELLAND MAIER& NEUSTADT PC1755 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY 4TH FLARLINGTON, VA 22202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Registered computer software in the fields of electronic commerce and electronic data transmission for use in recording, production, storing, processing and transmission of data, sound and picturesACTIVE—
035Business consultant services, namely, analysis of next generation business, product, service and competence for concern/industrial managementACTIVE—
037Installation of computer networksACTIVE—
038Telecommunications services, namely, ISDN services; computer supported transmission of information related to telecommunication and data communication via virtual open data communication networksACTIVE—
039Electric storage and collection of data and information about future business management strategy and analysis of business developmentACTIVE—
041Production of layouts to systematic operation and product manuals in computerized form for others; production and development of data communication via global computer network communicationsACTIVE—
042Computer diagnostic and prognostication services; consulting services in the form of professional expertise in the field of tele- and data communications; research and development of new products for others; providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network for the transfer and dissemination of a wide range of information; computer services, namely, providing databases featuring information about telecommunications and data communicationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 23, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 17, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 18, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 21, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 20, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 15, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 24, 2000CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 31, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 27, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 20, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 3, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 21, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance