Drawing for VIRTUAL INK

USPTO serial 75503562

VIRTUAL INK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2405096Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 21, 2000
Examiner
CROSS, TRACY L
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIRTUAL INK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LISA WINGER

LISA WINGER NEWELL RUBBERMAID2707 BUTTERFIELD RD STE 100OAK BROOK, IL 60523UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009ELECTRONIC DEVICES FOR CONVERTING WHITEBOARDS INTO ELECTRONIC WHITEBOARDS COMPRISED OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR RECOGNITION, CAPTURE, TRANSMISSION, STORING AND EDITING OF HANDWRITING ON COMPUTER SYSTEMS; ELECTRONIC STYLUS; JACKETS FOR INK MARKERS; ELECTRONIC ERASER; CABLES AND INSTRUCTION MANUALS SOLD THEREWITHEXPIRED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 24, 2011CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Oct 24, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 24, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2006CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Aug 8, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2000R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 29, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 28, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 16, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 16, 2000ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 23, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 23, 2000IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
May 19, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 11, 2000AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 10, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 10, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 9, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 17, 1999UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 9, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 9, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 4, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance