USPTO serial 75504027
EXELON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAIRD, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EXELON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Philadelphia, PA
Philadelphia, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN F MCNULTY
JOHN F MCNULTY PAUL & PAUL2000 MARKET ST STE 2900PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-3229UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | EQUIPMENT FOR METERING, MONITORING, COMMUNICATION CONTROL AND BILLING, BETWEEN ELECTRIC POWER AND GAS PROVIDERS AND THEIR CUSTOMERS, NAMELY, UTILITY METER ENCODERS; GAS METER ENCODERS; UNIVERSAL CONTROLLERS; TELEPHONE TO POWER-LINE CARRIER GATEWAYS; UTILITY METER CONCENTRATORS; LOAD MANAGEMENT CONTROLLERS; POWER LINE MODEMS; UTILITY INTERFACE UNITS; UTILITY METER INTERFACE MODULES; POWER MANAGEMENT HARDWARE, NAMELY POWER SENSORS, POWER LINE INTERRUPTERS, POWER CONTROLLERS; ELECTRIC METERS; GAS METERS; AUTOMATED METER READERS; AUTOMATED METER READING COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE, SUPERVISORY CONTROL AND DATA ACQUISITION COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE, ON-LINE REMOTE BILLING METERS, ON-LINE REMOTE BILLING COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE; AUTOMATED ENERGY USE CONTROLLERS; APPLIANCE LOAD-MONITORS AND CONTROLLERS; NETWORK TRANSDUCERS; POWER LINE TRANSCEIVERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | FURNACES; HEAT EXCHANGERS; VENTILATING FANS FOR COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL USE; AND WATER HEATERS FOR COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND DOMESTIC USE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 6, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 14, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 13, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 28, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |