USPTO serial 75504487
CYBERCOMMUTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOAGNI, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CYBERCOMMUTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
South Pasadena, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DANIEL R KIMBELL
DANIEL R KIMBELL WAGNER MIDDLEBROOK & KIMBELL LLP3541 OCEAN VIEW BLVDGLENDALE, CA 91208UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | BUSINESS MANAGEMENT COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY, COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR TASK AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATION SOFTWARE TO ACCESS [ON] COMPUTER NETWORKS, FOR EVALUATING COMPUTER SKILLS AND TRAINING IN SOFTWARE USE ON COMPUTER NETWORKS, FOR DATABASE MANAGEMENT ON COMPUTER NETWORKS, AND FOR COLLABORATIVE WORK ON COMPUTER NETWORKS, NAMELY, GROUP COLLABORATION SOFTWARE FOR GENERAL BUSINESS USAGE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 4, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |