USPTO serial 75504609
ROSCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2937179Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 5, 2005
- Examiner
- BENZMILLER, ANDREW
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ROSCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CH-1211 GENEVE 17, CH
New York, NY
CH-1211 GENEVE 17, CH
CH-1211 GENEVE 17, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GENE S WINTER
ST ONGE STEWARD JOHNSTON & REEN LLC986 BEDFORD STSTAMFORD, CT 06905-5619Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | TOILETS FEATURING ELECTRIC FLUID CONTROLS AND SEATS SOLD THEREWITH | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ROSCH HOLDINGS SA
- Other trademarks owned by Rosch Technologies LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ROSCH HOLDINGS SA
- Other trademarks owned by ROSCH HOLDINGS SA
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named ROSCH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 11, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 22, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 4, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |